Mothers Of Lost Children – Indiana

Support for Noncustodial Indiana Moms

Archive for October 2009

New Report Released: Indiana Earns a Failing Grade When it Comes to the Rights of Abused Children

leave a comment »

No surprises here.  Abused children are ushered into the grips of abusers by guardians ad litem frequently in Indiana, particularly in child custody cases.  Abuse is not taken seriously here, and it is the children who pay dearly.  Guardians ad litem get free reign to do this, and this needs to be changed!

Most States Fail to Protect Children’s Rights

A report to be released today says that most U.S. states do not adequately protect the rights of abused and neglected children, most notably by failing to provide these children with appointed counsel to represent their interests.

The report grades each state and the District of Columbia on how well they protect the legal rights of abused and neglected children in juvenile court proceedings. Only two states earned a grade of A+: Connecticut and Massachusetts. Twenty-nine states were given grades of C or lower. The lowest grade of F was given to seven states: Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Maine and North Dakota.

The peer-reviewed study, “A Child’s Right to Counsel: A National Report Card on Legal Representation for Abused and Neglected Children,” was conducted by two child-advocacy organizations, First Star and the Children’s Advocacy Institute at the University of San Diego School of Law. The full report is scheduled to be released today at 1 p.m. in a news
conference at the U.S. Capitol Building.

In addition to the grades mentioned above, the report graded other states as follows:

* A: Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Vermont and West Virginia.

* B: California, Kansas, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming.

* C: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and Wisconsin.

* D: Arizona, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, New Hampshire, South Dakota and Washington.

Key factors the study looked at in assigning grades were whether state law mandates the appointment of attorneys for children in dependency proceedings; whether these attorneys represent the children in a client-directed manner; whether the representation continues throughout the case, including appeal; whether states provide attorneys with specialized training; whether the child is given the legal status of a party to the proceedings; and whether rules pertaining to confidentiality and immunity from liability apply to attorneys representing these

As a sidebar note from the report section on Indiana:

Indiana code provides, except in cases of gross misconduct, ―immune[ity] from any civil liability that may occur as a result of that person‘s performance during the time that the person is acting within the duties of the [GAL]‖ (Burns Ind. Code § 31-32-3-10). This civil immunity provision applies only to individuals acting as a guardian ad litem or CASA whether or not they are attorneys. If an individual is appointed as an attorney for a child and not as a guardian ad litem, they are covered by the Rules of Professional Conduct and do not receive civil immunity.

Well, there you have it.  Indiana pretty much give a free pass to guardians ad litem to do whatever damage they can do to a child and the child’s family members, just as long as their buddies don’t find it to be “gross misconduct.”

Yes, Indiana deserves an F.  They’ve worked very hard to earn it.

To download this report, A Child’s Right to Counsel: A National Report Card on Legal Representation for Abused & Neglected Children,” please click here.


Thanks Indiana Supreme Court! But How About When Brizzi Won’t Go After Child Sexual Abusers?

leave a comment »

I see the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission is taking more action. Thank you!  But so much more has to be done about the corrupt situation in the family courts here with the lawyers and the judges dealing with these cases.  Nothing that Carl Brizzi is being investigated for in the current complaint compares with having his office look the other way when a child is being sexually abused, just because it is involving a child in a custody case.

An employee for the Marion County Prosecutor’s office, who has to remain anonymous, believes Kay’s story is legitimate, but could not take action due to the custody dispute.

Something has got to be done about letting children continue to be sexually abused, letting women continue to be battered, then taking their children away to be awarded to the abusers.

From the Indianapolis Star:

Brizzi faces disciplinary charges

Posted: October 7, 2009

The Indiana Supreme Court’s Disciplinary Commission has leveled charges against Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi for public comments about two cases, including the 2006 Hamilton Avenue slayings.The commission accuses Brizzi, a Republican, of making comments in a 2006 news release and during a 2008 news conference that went beyond informing the public of his decisions to file charges.

The complaint cites several comments by Brizzi condemning the two defendants accused of killing seven people on Hamilton Avenue, including: “They weren’t going to let anyone or anything get in the way of what they believed to be an easy score.” He said the crime merited the death penalty.

Last year, Brizzi speculated about accused serial killer Bruce Mendenhall’s mindset and discussed evidence against him in an Indianapolis killing.

The commission says in its Oct. 1 verified complaint that such comments outside the courtroom violate professional rules of conduct and could prejudice a case.

Desmond Turner’s trial in the Hamilton Avenue case begins Monday. Brizzi recently dropped his death penalty request in a deal that included Turner waiving his right to a jury.

“I think the timing is suspicious,” Brizzi said Wednesday. “I will reserve comment until I see the complaint.”

The Indiana Supreme Court will give Brizzi a chance to respond. In attorney discipline cases, the court can issue sanctions ranging from a private reprimand to disbarment.

Also see: Carl Brizzi: Prosecuting Battered Women