Archive for the ‘Indiana Child Protective Services’ Category
I had several dear friends on this recent show on Dr. Phil. Both mothers I know had their children killed by their fathers in horrible murder-suicides when the court ORDERED them to give the children to the father (even after death threats).
Mothers of children being taken and given to abusers and rapists are tired of not being heard. We won’t shut up, we won’t go away! Here’s a video someone made that has some pictures from the vigil. It’s awesome!
For the love of our children…
Vodpod videos no longer available.
In 1985, PAS was first described by Richard Gardner, a psychiatrist who wrote that adults having sex with children is not a bad thing.
Gardner described PAS as a “syndrome” whereby vengeful mothers employed child abuse allegations as a powerful weapon to punish ex-husbands and ensure custody to themselves. He further theorized that such protective parents enlisted the children in their “campaign of denigration” and “vilification” of the abuser, that they often “brainwashed” or “programmed” the children into believing untrue claims of abuse by the father, and that the children then fabricated and contributed their own stories.
To distance themselves from the discredited theory and its embarrassing originator, proponents of Parental Alienation Awareness Day sometimes claim that Parental Alienation Syndrome and parental alienation are different. In reality, they are often used synonymously and the consequences can be dire. Children can end up in the custody of their abusers.
Since 1985, abusers have come to convince family courts to ignore children’s allegations of abuse by invoking parental alienation and Parental Alienation Syndrome. They wrongly claim that mothers are to blame because they are brainwashing their children.
PAS WIDELY DISCREDITED
1996 – The Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family discredited the theory. It stated:
Although there are no data to support the phenomenon called parental alienation syndrome, in which protective parents are blamed for interfering with their children’s attachment to their abusers, the term is still used by some evaluators and courts to discount children’s fears in hostile and psychologically abusive situations. Family courts often do not consider the history of violence between the parents in making custody and visitation decisions. . . . Psychological evaluators not trained in domestic violence may contribute to this process by ignoring or minimizing the violence and by giving inappropriate pathological labels to women’s responses to chronic victimization. Terms such as “parental alienation” may be used to blame the women for the children’s reasonable fear of or anger toward their violent abuser.
2003 – The National District Attorneys Association’s Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse discredited the theory. It stated:
Although PAS may be hailed as a “syndrome” . . . in fact it is the product of anecdotal evidence gathered from Dr. Gardner’s own practice. […] PAS is based primarily upon two notions, neither of which has a foundation in empirical research. […] PAS is an untested theory that, unchallenged, can have far-reaching consequences for children seeking protection and legal vindication in courts of law.”
2006 – The American Bar Association’s Children’s Legal Rights Journal discredited the theory. It stated:
PAS’s twenty-year run in American courts is an embarrassing chapter in the history of evidentiary law. It reflects the wholesale failure of legal professionals entrusted with evidentiary gate-keeping intended to guard legal processes from the taint of pseudo-science…. As a matter of science, law, and policy PAS should remain inadmissible in American courts.
2006 – The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges also discredited the theory. It stated:
The discredited “diagnosis” of “PAS” (or allegation of “parental alienation”), quite apart from its scientific invalidity, inappropriately asks the court to assume that the children’s behaviors and attitudes toward the parent who claims to be “alienated” have no grounding in reality. It also diverts attention away from the behaviors of the abusive parent, who may have directly influenced the children’s responses by acting in violent, disrespectful, intimidating, humiliating and/or discrediting ways toward the children themselves, or the children’s other parent.
One of the most troubling consequences of Gardner’s theory is that, “PAS shifts attention away from the perhaps dangerous behaviour of the parent seeking custody to that of the custodial parent. This person, who may be attempting to protect the child, is instead presumed to be lying and poisoning the child.”
As a result, some children placed in the custody of their abusers have committed suicide; others have run away, and countless others have endured the abuse and are permanently traumatized. In recent years, children placed in custody of their abusers have been coming forward to tell their stories and to warn of the danger surrounding the fictitious syndrome.
 Gardner, 1992a; 1992b
 (Gardner, 1992b, p. 162, 193; 2002, pp. 94-95). – Meier, J. (2009, January). Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation: Research Reviews. Harrisburg, PA: VAWnet, a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Retrieved 3/10/2009, from: http://www.vawnet.org
 Pg 40
 Pg 100
 Bruch, Carol S., Parental Alienation Syndrome and Parental Alienation: getting It Wrong in Child Custody Case in Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol 14, No 4, 2002: 384.
A major flaw I believe with how Indiana CPS conducts investigations is that the abused children are often interviewed in the presence of the alleged perpetrator. I have seen it myself. My own children were quizzed about abuse in the presence of their abuser (their father) after reporting to mandated reporters at school that they had been abused. Because my children are in a custody dispute, CPS really did not investigate. They did not know the children were coached what to say to CPS by the abuser and were paid money to entice them into compliance. Everything was dropped.
As I was looking around for more information on the two dear children who died in Vanderburgh County on Saturday morning in the house fire, Alyssa and Caleb Lynch, I found this in the comments on CBS News:
by evillegirl47715 April 13, 2010 3:25 PM EDT
I am from this area and I know people who work in the two children’s school. The latest hearsay is that there were traces of duck tape found on the bed where the children’s bodies were located. So it is suspected that the SICK BASTARD taped the children to the bed and then set the house on fire.
It is very likely that the flippant attitude by Indiana CPS in disregarding abuse allegations very well lead to the children’s deaths. Jeff Weisheit, most likely panicked by the allegations, decided to do the children in after being reported by the children’s father and grandfather for abusing them:
Alyssa and Caleb Lynch were both recently in Panama City Florida celebrating a birthday almost 2 weeks ago with both my Father Joseph Lynch Jr. and Brother Steven Lynch. Caleb and Alyssa both notified my father and brother that Lisa’s boyfriend (Jeff Wesheit) was hitting them. Both my father and brother contacted CPS in Indiana about the incedent and nothing happened. Now our family has lost two wonderful children to the hand of a wicked man. The same man Lisa Lynch had an affair with while still married to my brother, ending their marriage. Joseph Michael Lynch 3rd
Apr. 12, 2010 2:17pm EDT | from michaellynch
If Indiana CPS personnel took their jobs seriously, they could have put the children into protective custody until an investigation was done PROPERLY. No, CPS seems bound determined to take children from good parents and leave them with abusers. Indiana CPS needs to be held accountable and charged as accessories to murder.
Read the Probable Cause Affidavit here. It indicates they found traces of duct tape on the children, indicating at least one was bound to the bed before the fire was started.
Two more dear children died this past weekend in a house fire. Dear Alyssa and Caleb Lynch lost their lives when mom’s fiance set fire to their house and left them to burn up while mom was at work. The two children were recently with their father to celebrate a birthday, and the children told their father and grandfather that the fiance, Jeff Weisheit, was hitting and mistreating them. Both the father and grandfather reported this to Indiana Child Protective Services over two weeks ago, and nothing was done about it. NOTHING.
Now the children are dead. Hope you all are sleeping well at night….their dear mother and father aren’t.
A short excerpt from WLWT:
Sheriff: ‘This Is Tough Stuff’
Weisheit is also facing charges in Indiana in connection with a fatal fire.
In Indiana, Vanderburgh County deputies said rescue crews were called to the fire at 10040 Fisher Road at about 4 a.m. Saturday.Fire crews said that the home was engulfed in flames when they arrived. Neighbors told firefighters that Weisheit lived at the home with his fiancée, Lisa Lynch, and her two children, Alyssa, 8, and Caleb, 5. Lynch was at work at the time of the fire.When deputies could not find Weisheit, an alert was put out to find him. That’s what led to the chase in Boone County. Indiana officials said that firefighters found the bodies of two children inside Weisheit’s home. The bodies have been taken to the Vanderburgh County Coroner’s Office for an autopsy and positive identification.
“This is tough stuff,” Vanderburgh County Sheriff Eric Williams said. “The fire was put out, and our people, along with German Township, began searching through that debris and as a result of that search we recovered two deceased children that were burned badly.”Investigators said they believe the fire was intentionally set. Covington police said that Weisheit admitted to setting the fire and that he knew the children were in the home at the time.
And look here in the comments:
Alyssa and Caleb Lynch were both recently in Panama City Florida celebrating a birthday almost 2 weeks ago with both my Father Joseph Lynch Jr. and Brother Steven Lynch. Caleb and Alyssa both notified my father and brother that Lisa’s boyfriend (Jeff Wesheit) was hitting them. Both my father and brother contacted CPS in Indiana about the incedent and nothing happened. Now our family has lost two wonderful children to the hand of a wicked man. The same man Lisa Lynch had an affair with while still married to my brother, ending their marriage. Joseph Michael Lynch 3rdApr. 12, 2010 2:17pm EDT | from michaellynch
In regards to the murder of Alyssa, and Caleb Lynch. These two beautiful children were my Neice and Nephew. I am thankful that police were able to apprehend the monster responsible, however this will never bring back these children. Joseph Michael Lynch 3rdApr. 12, 2010 1:59pm EDT | from michaellynch
May this dear family get some justice for these horrible deaths. Just because a broken family is involved…just because it involves children of divorce doesn’t mean you can keep blowing this off. Run everyone into prison who works for CPS and has blown off child abuse charges, because too many children are paying the ultimate price here in Indiana. May little Alyssa and Caleb rest in peace.
Also see Indiana CPS: Accessories to Murder
MOTHERS DAY AT THE WHITE HOUSE
In the somber spirit of the U.S. suffragettes, the Argentine Mothers of the Disappeared, the Turkish Saturday Mothers, the German Rose Street Women, and most recently, the Liberian women who stopped a civil war, we are gathering at the White House to ask our President to meet with our delegates and to help stop the systematic removal and oppression of our children by family court.
Peaceful silent vigil at the White House in Washington DC
Sunday May 9, 2010 from 11:00 am until at least 2:00 pm.
Exact location TBD. We are requesting a permit for Penn Ave and 14th.
We will bring white ‘Mothers of Lost Children’ tshirts, white scarves and handouts. Be sure to bring water bottles, powerbars, suntan lotion, dark glasses, umbrella. Reserve hotels soon (unless you travel by night on a bus and don’t stay in DC).
A few suggestions for posterboard signs to bring with you to hold:
- Children are taken from safe mothers and forced to live with abusers. Why?
- I gave birth to a beloved daughter: Her batterer has custody.
- I gave birth to a cherished son: His identified molester has custody.
- I gave birth to three precious children: Our violator has custody.
- I fear judicial retaliation: What country IS this? (if a scarf is over your face)
- Mr. President, please stop the children’s suffering.
We are compiling one page stories into a booklet. If you would like to contribute factual information and quotes, especially words from your children, send them to us (firstname.lastname@example.org). You don’t need to give any identifying information. Also, contact us to connect with others in your region who plan to come. Come early or stay later in the week to visit your Congressmembers, if you wish. Just find the name and make an appointment with him/her, or his/her staffer!
Attention Indiana Legislature: Read About The Shared Parenting Disaster in Australia Before You Do it to Us
This is from the Daily Telegraph in Australia, where they are already experiencing problems with forced shared parenting. The “shared parenting” advocates in Indiana, at least some of them, believe that even an abusive parent deserves shared parenting. This is horrifying to us that see our children abused and the abusers are applauded by the family courts of Indiana and often rewarded with full custody of the children. This is often the starting point – shared parenting – but the goal is to get out of child support and gain full custody.
Children ‘at risk’ in shared parenting
THE practice of splitting child custody equally between divorced parents is being questioned after a major study found one in five parents in the arrangement believed it was not working.
An estimated 90,000 Australian children are in shared-care arrangements under a policy introduced by the Howard government with the support of fathers’ rights groups.
But the largest study of the family law system, released yesterday, found a presumption of a 50-50 split was putting some children into violent homes.
Attorney-General Robert McClelland said yesterday a “misunderstanding” that parents were guaranteed equal time under the law was to blame. “Bush lawyers or pub lawyers are providing advice to people going through the system that is wrong,” he said.
“We are now in a situation where people have resolved cases where the best interest of children may have not been regarded.”
Family laws introduced in 2006 included a presumption of equal parental responsibility, widely interpreted as an even-time split.
But researchers said yesterday parents had agreed to shared care even when they did not have to. Other parents were disillusioned because they were not granted a perfectly equal arrangement.
And violence was not being addressed in court because of the threat of paying full court costs if the allegations were not proven.
Mens Rights Agency director Sue Price said any shift away from equal time was a “disastrous” return to the old-fashioned notion that fathers didn’t count.
“It is not good for children not to have both mum and dad in their life,” Ms Price said.
The Australian Institute of Family Studies report, which took three years and surveyed 28,000 people, found about one in 20 children in shared care had parents who reported violence as a risk.
“There are significant concerns around the minority of families where there are safety concerns,” institute director Professor Alan Hayes said. Where safety concerns were reported by parents, children suffered but they suffered the most when they were in shared care agreements, he said.
But researchers found “overwhelming” community support for the concept of shared parenting.
Ms Price said violence by women was ignored in the three reports released yesterday.